Something occurred to me about the difference between "Permanent Devotion" and "Spent Devotion" ... PD lends itself to story arc - a change in scope
from the early game to the late game. This is the kind of thing I think
can give a game an epic feel. SD is more cyclical and therefore
tactical - once you spend your devotion, you're back to the beginning, and in the late game you're doing the same kind of things you were doing in the early game.
Of
course, there are other ways to inject story arc into a game, and
things like permanent/reusable artifacts can create that change in scope
as well. But that might be why I'm interested in a more PD type of
dynamic.
That said, at the end of my last blog post it occurred to me that maybe the game could have both... for a low cost you could up your devotion, then later spend it back down, and for a higher cost maybe you could up your minimum devotion for a more permanent effect (that comes with a higher investment).
On
that note, this morning I started thinking about how the board might
look. I'm assuming Deus style board pieces, with a healthy number of
water hexes, for a variable board. Boats exist and move on hexes that
show water, land units ("dudes" for lack of a better term) exist and move on hexes that show land. Some
hexes might show both (coast, or river), and so both types of units
could go there.
Thus, Poseidon could let you add boats
to the board and move them around, and Ares could do the same for dudes. I envision a lot of water (great seas with islands) such that you
might concentrate on land units (devotion to Ares) or sea (devotion to
Poseidon), or potentially try to do both - at the cost of one, the other,
or some other deity. This sounds analogous to Warfare vs
Colonization in a way.
There could be "city" type
spaces indicated on the board, where you would want to move your units. Maybe these cities are worth points to the player with the most
units at them (at the end of the game for example), so part of the game
is "fighting" over cities via area control (and perhaps there are ways
to remove pieces from the board - actual fighting). I think I'd want the
actual directly interactive fighting to be minimal/secondary in this
game, because I generally don't like those types of games.
I
envision the cities having "slots" or spaces for Buildings or Monuments
(or hybrid spaces which can hold either). In fact, each city could
offer a different combination of:
* Spaces for units (so max capacity for area control, maybe overstuffing a city is how you "fight")
* Spaces for Buildings
* Spaces for Monuments
* Spaces for Building/Monuments (either/or)
* Victory points (and maybe Buildings/Monuments increase the VP value of a city)
I also envision generic pieces, not player specific, for Buildings and Monuments.
When you build a Building, you actually put a card into play in front
of you - maybe from a hand of cards, or maybe
from a supply pool - and you place a generic Building piece (maybe a
cube, though ideally a little molded Greek building would be awesome) into a city where you have a unit. Maybe this increases the value of the city as well.
Monuments
would be a different shape (a disc? Molded Greek statues would be awesome
in production) but also generic, and when you place one of those, maybe you get to permanently increase your Devotion to a particular god,
or how you add a card for that god to the deck (or both). That way you wouldn't
need any other way to remember which god it was, or who built the
monument. And again, maybe monuments increase the value of the city. Though I guess it would be cool if, ignoring the effect for the player
building it, Buildings and Monuments meant different things to the city. That might make hybrid spaces more interesting.
It's possible that each thing in the game (boats, dudes, buildings, and maybe even monuments) could have 2 different sizes, and if your devotion is high enough, then you get the bigger one (which counts as 2).
For buildings that could relate to the power level of the building you
get as well. Each building could have a level (I or II) and you
need at least X devotion to get a level II building... or maybe better, each
building has a level I side and a Level II side, and if your devotion is
high enough then you get the better version of the building.
That gives us reasons for the following deities so far:
Zeus - turn order
Hermes - gold
Poseidon - boats
Ares - dudes
Hephaestus - buildings
and maybe:
Athena - monuments
Hades - killing units? Culling the deck?
Would it be good to get some semblance of Agriculture in there as well?
Another aspect cities could have (wheat icons), which could relate
to... number of units you can have? Number of units that fit in the city
(maybe devotion to Demeter can increase that)? Amount of food you
harvest (and then feed to your units)?
I guess that could act as a limiter of how many dudes you can have in play,
kinda like the feeding mechanism in Agricola. But if area majority is
the only way to score, then might that just be some necessary evil? How do
you get by on low food and still win majorities? Maybe this whole idea
is not necessary.
As always, I welcome your thoughts on this!
Posts
